SASSA R350 Grant Payments Delay News Today – Covid-19, as well as the restrictions and lockdown measures, had a significant impact on South African individuals’ social and economic activities. In May 2020, the government announced the R350 stipend to help those in need.
Due to the delayed economic recovery, the award has since been extended until March 2023 by the Department of Social Development (DSD) via the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa).
Since the grant’s inception in 2020, Sassa has had various difficulties in paying eligible persons, and the requirements for beneficiaries of the award have undergone numerous adjustments.
Also check: SASSA News Update Today
SASSA R350 Grant Payments Delay News Today
The Social Relief of Distress Grant Minister, Lindiwe Zulu, revealed that R44 billion was allotted to serve 10.5 billion out of the 10.9 qualified recipients up until the end of March 2023 when the third iteration of the grant was implemented.
Serious difficulties were encountered in the first three months, which caused a two-month delay in grant execution.
According to provisions within the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), the department is expected to remain within the given allocation, therefore the shortage caused the department to create the first new qualifying criteria for the award, she says.
“This includes establishing an R350 means test cutoff for all candidates. This was done by verifying each applicant’s bank account each month to see if their monthly income was R350 or greater.
According to Zulu, the evaluation presented the DSD with a number of difficulties because it required them to enter into negotiations with the banks to carry out these means tests, and banks always opt to protect their customers.
The means test threshold recently increased from R350 to R624, according to a recent announcement from the department. The rise led to a lot of confusion since individuals believed that the grant payment had been increased, although this was not the case.
According to Zulu, the department’s biggest problem was the grant’s low uptake because it was less than the budgeted amount.
“The money that has not been spent must be returned to the National Treasury, notwithstanding the fact that there are more and more hungry and homeless people in the neighborhoods,” She claims
The Department of Social Development and Sassa are optimistic that the higher criterion would result in more people applying for grants.